Vnitr Lek 1993, 39(8):784-787

[An unusual cause of recurrent septic states].

J Sochman, M Rocek, J Kakác, J Pi»ha
Klinika kardiologie Institutu klinické a experimentální medicíny, Praha.

The authors describe the septic sequelae of an unobserved embolization of a central venous catheter into right-sided cardiac compartments. The finding of an embolized fragment of a catheter which was in the patient's circulation for 89 days was quite incidental. The previous period was associated with diagnostic doubts in various departments. The most frequent diagnosis of repeated septicaemia was bacterial endocarditis, although repeated echocardiographic examinations did not confirm it. Similarly, repeated X-rays did not contribute to the diagnosis--this can be explained by dilatation of the heart of the patient. Extraction of the embolized fragment by means of a catheter resolved the problem. The fragment was colonized by the causal agent of the febrile conditions--Staphylococcus aureus.

Keywords: Adult; Catheterization, Central Venous, adverse effects, ; Embolism, diagnosis, ; Equipment Failure; Foreign-Body Migration, complications, ; Heart; Humans; Male; Recurrence; Sepsis, etiology, ; Staphylococcal Infections, diagnosis,

Published: August 1, 1993  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Sochman J, Rocek M, Kakác J, Pi»ha J. [An unusual cause of recurrent septic states]. Vnitr Lek. 1993;39(8):784-787.
Download citation




Vnitřní lékařství

Madam, Sir,
please be aware that the website on which you intend to enter, not the general public because it contains technical information about medicines, including advertisements relating to medicinal products. This information and communication professionals are solely under §2 of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. Is active persons authorized to prescribe or supply (hereinafter expert).
Take note that if you are not an expert, you run the risk of danger to their health or the health of other persons, if you the obtained information improperly understood or interpreted, and especially advertising which may be part of this site, or whether you used it for self-diagnosis or medical treatment, whether in relation to each other in person or in relation to others.

I declare:

  1. that I have met the above instruction
  2. I'm an expert within the meaning of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. the regulation of advertising, as amended, and I am aware of the risks that would be a person other than the expert input to these sites exhibited


No

Yes

If your statement is not true, please be aware
that brings the risk of danger to their health or the health of others.