Vnitr Lek 2025, 71(3):176-182 | DOI: 10.36290/vnl.2025.031

New therapeutic options and trends in the treatment of multiple myelom

Roman Hájek1, 2, Ludmila Muroňová1, 2, Jana Mihályová1, 2, Michaela Horňáková1, Tereza Popková1, 2, Hana Plonková1, Tomáš Jelínek1, 2
1 Klinika hematoonkologie FN Ostrava
2 Klinika hematoonkologie, Lékařská fakulta Ostravské univerzity

Progress in multiple myeloma (MM) treatment is remarkable. Combined regimens for newly diagnosed MM patients achieve progression-free survival of more than seven years. In the Czech Republic, the approval of a four-drug combination of anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody (mAb) with a proteasome inhibitor (PI), immunomodulatory agent (IMiD) and dexamethasone is expecting in 2025. It is not yet clear whether consolidation with autologous transplantation will be beneficial in terms of extending the time to progression. The development of immunotherapy has literally exploded. Autologous chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CAR T-cells) targeting the BCMA antigen have already been approved for second-line therapy in the USA. The development of bispecific antibodies (bsAb) is even faster. Bispecific antibodies targeting BCMA and GPRC5D antigens are available in late relapse. Clinical trials are testing additional therapeutic targets (e.g., FcRH5) and combination regimens (e.g., bsAb, PI, IMiD). Response rates to these combinations in the first line treatment are 90-100 %, with a high percentage of patients achieving minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity. In 2024, assessment of MRD was approved as a primary outcome in clinical trials and it is likely that we are now moving to wals an era of MRD-driven therapy.

Keywords: immunotherapy, minimal residual disease, CAR T-cells, bispecific antibodies.

Accepted: April 28, 2025; Published: May 16, 2025  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Hájek R, Muroňová L, Mihályová J, Horňáková M, Popková T, Plonková H, Jelínek T. New therapeutic options and trends in the treatment of multiple myelom. Vnitr Lek. 2025;71(3):176-182. doi: 10.36290/vnl.2025.031.
Download citation

References

  1. Hájek R, Maisnar V, Minařík J, et al. Diagnostika a léčba mnohočetného myelomu. 2023. Transfuze a hematologie dnes 2023;29, (Suppl. 2).
  2. Durie BGM, Hoering A, Abidi MH, et al. Bortezomib with lenalidomide and dexamethasone versus lenalidomide and dexamethasone alone in patiens with newly diagnosed myeloma without intent for inermediate autologous stem-cell transplant (SWOG S0777): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2017; 89:519-527. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Facon T, Kumar S, Orlowski RZ, et al. Final survival analysis of daratumumab plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone vs. lenalidomide and dexamethasone in transplant-ineligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: MAIA study. EHA Library Facon; 421032 (2024); P968. Available from: https://library.ehaweb.org/eha/2024/eha2024-congress/421032/thierry.facon.final.survival.analysis.of.daratumumab.plus.lenalidomide.and.html.
  4. Facon T, Dimopoulos MA, Leleu XP, et al. Isatuximab, bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone for multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2024 Oct 31;391(17):1597-1609. Available from: http://doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2400712. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Sonneveld P, Dimopoulos MA, Boccadoro M, et al. Daratumumab, bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone for multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2024 Jan 25;390(4):301-313. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Devasia AJ, Chari A, Lancman G. Bispecific antibodies in the treatment of multiple myeloma. Blood Cancer Journal. 2024, 14; 158. Available from: http:// doi.org/10.1038/s41408-024-01139-y. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. San Miguel J, Dhakal B, Yong K, et al. Cilta-cel or standard care in lenalidomide-refractory multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2023;389:335-347. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee (ODAC). i 2TEAMM presentation to support MRD as accelerated approval endpoint. Data from April 2024. Available from: .
  9. Rückert M, Azarias G, Garg M et al. Evolution of treatment patterns and survival outcomes in European Patiens with multiple myeloma from 2012-2023 Throughthe HONEUR Federated Data Network. Blood. 2024;144(Supplement 1):2388-2388. Available from: http://doi:10.1182/blood-2024-201692. Go to original source...
  10. Berdeja JG, Madduri D, Usmani SZ, et al. Ciltacabtagene Autoleucel, a B-Cell maturation antigen-directed chimeric antigen receptor T-Cell therapy in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (CARTITUDE-1): A Phase 1 b/2 Open-Label Study. The Lancet. 2021;398(10297):314-24. Available from: http:// doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00933-8. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Lin Y, Martin TG, Usmani SZ, et al. CARTITUDE-1 final results: Phase 1 b/2 study of ciltacabtagene autoleucel in heavily pretreated patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2023;41(16_suppl):8009-8009. Available from: http://doi:10.1200/JCO.2023. 41. 16_suppl.8009. Go to original source...
  12. Martin T, Usmani SZ, Berdeja JG, et al. Ciltacabtagene Autoleucel, an Anti-B-cell maturation antigen chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy, for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: CARTITUDE-1 2-Year Follow-Up. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2023;41(6):1265-74. Available from: http://doi:10.1200/JCO.22.00842. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. Munshi NC, Anderson LD, Shah N, et al. Idecabtagene Vicleucel in relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma. New England Journal of Medicine. 2021;384(8):705-16. Available from: http://doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2024850. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. Rodriguez-Otero P, Ailawadhi S, Arnulf B, et al. Ide-Cel or standard regimens in relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma. New England Journal of Medicine. 2023; 388(11):1002-14. Available from:. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  15. Moreau P, Garfall AL, van de Donk NWCJ, et al. Teclistamab in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. New England Journal of Medicine. 2022; 387(6): 495-505. Available from: http://doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2203478. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  16. Lesokhin AM, Tomasson MH, Arnulf B, et al. Elranatamab in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma: Phase 2 MagnetisMM-3 Trial results. Nature Medicine. 2023; 29(9): 2259-67. Available from: http://doi:10.1038/s41591-023-02528-9. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  17. Cohen AD, Garfall AL, Stadtmaue EA, et al. B cell maturation antigen-specific CAR T cells are clinically active in multiple myeloma. The Journal of Clinical Investigation. 2022;129(6):2210-21. Available from: http://doi:10.1172/JCI126397. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  18. Van Oekelen O, Aleman A, Upadhyaya B, et al. Neurocognitive and hypokinetic movement disorder with features of parkinsonism after BCMA-targeting CAR-T cell therapy. Nature Medicine. 2021;27(12):2099-2103. Available from: http:// doi:10.1038/s41591-021-01564-7. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  19. Chari A, Minnema MC, Berdeja JG, et al. Talquetamab, a T-cell-redirecting GPRC5D bispecific antibody for multiple myeloma. New England Journal of Medicine. 2022;387(24):2232-44. Available from: http://doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2204591. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  20. Hayden PJ, Roddie C, Bader P, et al. Management of adults and children receiving CAR T-cell therapy: 2021 best practice recommendations of the European Society for BMT and the JACIE and EHA. Ann Oncol. 2022 Mar;33(3):259-275. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  21. Lee DW, Santomasso BD, Locke FL, et al. ASTCT consensus grading for cytokine release syndrome and neurologic toxicity associated with immune effector cells. Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation: Journal of the American Society for BMT 2019; 25(4): 625-38. Available from: http://doi:10.1016/j.bbmt.2018.12.758. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  22. Yakoub-Agha I, Chabannon C, Bader P, et al. Management of adults and children undergoing chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy: best practice recommendations of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation and the Joint Accreditation Committee of ISCT and EBMT. Haematologica. 2020;105(2):297-316. Available from: http://doi:10.3324/haematol.2019.229781. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  23. Searle E, Quach H, Wong SW, et al. Teclistamab in combination with subcutaneous daratumumab and lenalidomide in patients with multiple myeloma: Results from one cohort of MajesTEC-2, a Phase1b, multicohort study. Blood. 2022;140(Supplement 1):394-96. Available from: http://doi:10.1182/blood-2022-159711. Go to original source...
  24. D'Souza A, Costa LJ, San Miguel JF, et al. Teclistamab, daratumumab, and pomalidomide in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: Results from the Majestec-2 Cohort a and Trimm2 Studies. Blood. 2024;144(Supplement 1):495; Available from: http://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2024-200181. Go to original source...
  25. Raab MS, Weinhold N, Kortüm M, et al. Phase 2 study of teclistamab-based induction regimens in patients with transplant-eligible (TE) newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM): Results from the GMMG-HD10/DSMM-XX (MajesTEC-5) Trial. Blood. 2024;144 (Supplement 1):493. Available from: http://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2024-206003. Go to original source...
  26. Zamagni E, Silzle T, Špička I, et al. Phase 3 study of teclistamab (Tec) in combination with lenalidomide (Len) and tec alone versus len alone in NDMM as maintenance therapy following ASCT: Safety run-in results from the Majestec-4/EMN30 Trial. Blood 2024; 144 (Supplement 1): 494. Go to original source...
  27. Prince HM, Bahlis NJ, Rodriguez-Otero P, et al. MagnetisMM-3: Long-term update and efficacy and safety of less frequent dosing of elranatamab in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. Blood. 2024;144(Supplement 1):4738. Available from: http://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2024-208192. Go to original source...
  28. Tomasson M, Iida S, Niesvizky R, et al. Long-term efficacy and safety of elranatamab monotherapy in the phase 2 Magnetismm-3 Trial in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Blood. 2023;142(Supplement 1):3385. Available from: http:// doi:10.1182/blood-2023-182130. Go to original source...
  29. Pianko M, Pawlyn C, Huang SY, et al. MagnetisMM-9: Efficacy and safety of step-up priming doses and longer dosing intervals of elranatamab (ELRA) in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Blood. 2024;144 (Supplement 1): 4743. Available from: http://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2024-205872. Go to original source...
  30. Tomasson MH., Gabayan E, Ali SA, et al. Efficacy of elranatamab (ELRA) in combination with carfilzomib (CFZ) and dexamethasone (DEX) in the phase 1 b MagnetisMM-20 Trial in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Blood. 2024;144 (Supplement 1):1024. Available from: http://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2024-210520. Go to original source...
  31. Bumma N, Richter J, Jagannath S, et al. Linvoseltamab for treatment of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2024;42(22):2702-12. Available from: http://doi:10.1200/JCO.24.01008. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  32. Rodriguez Valdes C, Voorhees PM, D'Souza A, et al. Efficacy, safety, and determination of RP2D of ABBV-383, a BCMA bispecific antibody, in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2024;42(16_suppl):7531-7531. Available from: http://doi:10.1200/JCO.2024. 42. 16_suppl.7531. Go to original source...
  33. Rodriguez C, Mielnik M, Kazandjian D, et al. ABBV-383 plus daratumumab-dexamethasone in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma: A phase 1 b dose-escalation and safety expansion study. Blood. 2024;144(Supplement 1):496; Available from:. Go to original source...
  34. Matous J, Biran N, Perrot A, et al. Talquetamab + pomalidomide in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: Safety and preliminary efficacy results from the phase 1 b MonumenTAL-2 Study. Blood. 2023;142(Supplement 1):1014. Available from: http://doi:10.1182/blood-2023-187706. Go to original source...
  35. Nooka A, Cochrane T, D'Souza A, et al. Talquetamab, a GPRC5D×CD3 bispecific antibody, in combination with daratumumab and lenalidomide in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: Safety and efficacy results from the phase 1 b Monumental-2 study. Blood. 2024;144(Supplement 1):1975. Available from: http://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2024-199773. Go to original source...
  36. Cohen YC, Magen H, Gatt ME, et al. Talquetamab plus teclistamab in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. N Eng J Med. 2025;392(2):138-149. Available from: http://doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2406536. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  37. Carlo-Stella C, Mazza R, Manier S, et al. RG6234, a GPRC5DxCD3 T-cell engaging bispecific antibody, is highlya ctive in patients with RRMM: Updated intravenous and first subcutaneous results from a Phase I dose-escalation study. Blood. 2022;140(Supplement 1):397-399. Go to original source...
  38. Richter J, Thomas SK, Krishnan AY, et al. Cevostamab in patients with heavily pretreated RRMM. Results from an ongoing phase I study demonstrate clinically meaningful activity and manageable safety and inform the doses and regimen for combination studies. Blood. 2024;144(Supplement 1):1021. Available from: http:// doi.org/10.1182/blood-2024-199542. Go to original source...
  39. Kumar S, Berdeja J, Sborov D, et al. Cevostamab in patients with RRMM who are triple-class refraktory and have received a prior BCMA-targeted ADC or CAR T-cell: Initial results from Phase I/II CAMMA 2 study. EHA Library Facon; 422314(2024);S210. Available from: https://library.ehaweb.org/eha/2024/eha2024-congress/422314/shaji.kumar.cevostamab.in.patients.with.rrmm.who.are.triple-class.refractory.html.
  40. Další literatura u autora a na www.casopisvnitrnilekarstvi.cz
  41. Driessen C, Baur K, Heim D, et al. A national platform and scoring system allocates CAR-T treatment slots for multiple myeloma to patients with high likelihood of complete remission. Blood. 2023;142(Supplement 1):4701. Available from:. Go to original source...
  42. Liu Y, Xingxing J, Li N, et al. A combination of pre-infusion serum ferritin, CRP and IL-6 predicts outcome in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma patients treated with CAR-T cells. Frontiers in Immunology 2023;14: 1169071. Available from:. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  43. Fischer L, Grieb N, Born P, et al. Cellular dynamics following CAR T cell therapy are associated with response and toxicity in relapsed/refractory myeloma. Leukemia 2024;38(2):372-82. Available from:. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  44. Paiva B, Manrique I, Thompson EG, et al. Biological and clinical significance of edogenous and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell immune profiling in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) patients. Blood. 2024;144 (Supplement 1): 900; Available from:. Go to original source...
  45. Lee H, Durante M, Skerget S, et al. Impact of soluble BCMA and non-T-cell factors on refractoriness to BCMA-targeting T-cell engagers in multiple myeloma. Blood 2024;144(25):2637-51. Available from:. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  46. Kumar S, Paiva B, Anderson KC, et al. International Myeloma Working Group consensus criteria for response and minimal residual disease assessment in multiple myeloma. The Lancet Oncology 2016 Aug;17(8):e328-46. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  47. Gonzalez C, Lasa M, Notarfranchi L, et al. Minimally invasive assessment of measurable residual disease (MRD) in multiple myeloma. Blood. 2023;142(Supplement 1):339. Go to original source...
  48. Avet-Loiseau H, Ludwig H, Landgren O, et al. Minimal residual disease status as a surrogate endpoint for progression-free survival in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma studies: A meta-analysis. Clinical Lymphoma Myeloma and Leukemia. 2020 Jan;20(1):e30-7. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  49. Landgren O, Devlin S, Boulad M, et al. Role of MRD status in relation to clinical outcomes in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients: a meta-analysis. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2016 Dec;51(12):1565-8. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  50. Munshi NC, Avet-Loiseau H, Anderson KC, et al. A large meta-analysis establishes the role of MRD negativity in long-term survival outcomes in patients with multiple myeloma. Blood Advances. 2020 Dec 8;4(23):5988-99. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  51. Muroňová L, Souček O, Žihala D, et al. Real-world evidence on prognostic value of MRD in multiple myeloma using flow cytometry. Eur J Haematol 2025 Jan;114(1):155-163. Available from:. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  52. Paiva B, Puig N, Cedena MT, et al. Measurable residual disease by next-generation flow cytometry in multiple myeloma. JCO 2020 Mar 10;38(8):784-92. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  53. Meseha, M., Hoffman, J., Kazandjian, D. et al. Minimal residual disease-adapted therapy in multiple myeloma: Current evidence and opinions. Curr Oncol Rep 2024, 26; 679-690. Available from:. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  54. Costa LJ, Chhabra S, Medvedova E, et al. Minimal residual disease response-adapted therapy in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MASTER): final report of the multicentre, single-arm, phase 2 trial. The Lancet Haematology 2023 Nov;10(11):e890-901. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  55. Derman BA, Major A, Cooperrider J, et al. Discontinuation of maintenance therapy in multiple myeloma guided by multimodal measurable residual disease negativity (MRD2STOP). Blood Cancer J. 2024 Oct 7;14(1):170. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  56. Pasquini MC, Wallace PK, Logan B, et al. Minimal residual dsease status in multiple myeloma 1 year after autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation and lenalidomide maintenance are associated with long-term overall survival. JCO 2024 Aug 10;42(23):2757-68. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  57. Dhakal B. MRD-guided sequential therapy for deep response in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM)-Master-2 Trial. Blood 2024; 144: 2000. Go to original source...
  58. Shah N, Patel S, Pei H, et al. Subcutaneous daratumumab plus lenalidomide versus lenalidomide alone as maintenance therapy in patients with NDMM who are MRD positive after frontline ASCT: The phase 3 AURIGA study. Journal of Clinical Oncology 2021; Volume 39, Number 15_suppl.; Available from:. Go to original source...
  59. D'Agostino M, Bertuglia G, Rota-Scalabrini D, et al. Predictors of unsustained measurable residual disease negativity in patients with multiple myeloma. Blood 2024 Feb 15;143(7):592-6. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  60. Guerrero C, Puig N, Cedena MT, et al. Predictors of unsustained measurable residual disease negativity in transplant-eligible patients with multiple myeloma. Blood 2024 Feb 15;143(7):597-603. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  61. Barlogie B, Mitchell A, van Rhee F, et al. Curing myeloma at last: defining criteria and providing the evidence. Blood 2014; Nov 13;124(20):3043-51. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  62. Weisel K, Kumar S, Moreau P, et al. Daratumumab plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone vs. lenalidomide and dexamethasone (RD) alone in transplant-ineligible patiens with newly diagnosed MM: updated analysis of the Phase 3 MAIA study. Hemasphere 2023 May; 7(Suppl): 14-15. Go to original source...
  63. Zweegman S, Facon T, Hungria V, et al. Phase 3 Randomized Study of Daratumumab (DARA)+ Bortezomib, Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone (VRd) Versus Alone in Patients with Transplant-Ineligible Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma or for Whom Transplant Is Not Planned As Initial Therapy: Analysis of Minimal Residual Disease in the Cepheus Trial. Blood (2024) 144 (Supplement 1): 362. Go to original source...




Vnitřní lékařství

Madam, Sir,
please be aware that the website on which you intend to enter, not the general public because it contains technical information about medicines, including advertisements relating to medicinal products. This information and communication professionals are solely under §2 of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. Is active persons authorized to prescribe or supply (hereinafter expert).
Take note that if you are not an expert, you run the risk of danger to their health or the health of other persons, if you the obtained information improperly understood or interpreted, and especially advertising which may be part of this site, or whether you used it for self-diagnosis or medical treatment, whether in relation to each other in person or in relation to others.

I declare:

  1. that I have met the above instruction
  2. I'm an expert within the meaning of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. the regulation of advertising, as amended, and I am aware of the risks that would be a person other than the expert input to these sites exhibited


No

Yes

If your statement is not true, please be aware
that brings the risk of danger to their health or the health of others.