Vnitr Lek 2006, 52(11):1030-1036

The importance of anamnesis in differential diagnosis of reflex and cardiogenic syncope

P. Mitro*, P. Kirsch, Z. Zausinová
III. interná klinika Lekárskej fakulty UPJŠ a FN L. Pasteura, Košice, Slovenská republika, prednosta doc. MUDr. Peter Mitro, Ph.D.

The aim of the study was to establish the difference in the anamnestic data in cardiogenic and reflex syncope during a systematic gathering of data using a structured questionnaire and to measure the benefits of structured clinical history in differential diagnosis of syncope.

Methodology:
70 patients with syncope of undetermined etiology (average age 51 years, 26 men and 44 women) underwent a standard diagnostic protocol procedure. Cardiogenic syncope was diagnosed in 16 patients (23 %), vasovagal syncope in 34 patients (49 %), in 20 patients (28 %) the cause of the syncope remained uncertain. Anamnestic data was collected through a structured questionnaire which contained 70 points.


Outcome:
Patients with cardiogenic syncope, as opposed to those with vasovagal syncope, tended to show higher age (68 vs 43 years, p < 0.001), higher occurrence of IHD (75 % vs 35 %, p = 0.008) and hypertension (62 % vs 29 %, p = 0.02). Cardiogenic syncope in the prodromal phase exhibited a more frequent feeling of weakness (43 % vs 14 %, p = 0.02), absence of the typical provoking factor (56 % vs 15 %, p < 0.001), unspecific occurrence during the day (81 % vs 41 %, p = 0.008), and weak pulse according to witness report (50 % vs 8 %, p = 0.01). There was a significantly higher incidence of visual disturbances in vasovagal syncope in the prodromal phase (47 % vs 19 %, p = 0.05) and sweating (29 % vs 6 %, p = 0.05), provoking factors often involved long standing on feet (66 % vs 25 %, p = 0.01) and hunger (29 % vs 0 %, p = 0.01), and paleness was often reported by witnesses as opposed to vasovagal syncope (91 % vs 31 %, p = 0.04). The rate of occurrence of palpitation and nausea in the prodromal phase was identical in both types of syncope.

Conclusion:
There exists a significant difference in anamnestic data of patients with cardiogenic syncope and those with vasovagal syncope. Detailed clinical history is a useful method in differential diagnosis of syncope.

Keywords: syncope; diagnosis; clinical history

Received: March 20, 2006; Accepted: July 12, 2006; Published: November 1, 2006  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Mitro P, Kirsch P, Zausinová Z. The importance of anamnesis in differential diagnosis of reflex and cardiogenic syncope. Vnitr Lek. 2006;52(11):1030-1036.
Download citation

References

  1. Alboni P, Brignole M, Menozzi C et al. Diagnostic value of history in patients with syncope with or without heart disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001; 37: 1921-1928. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Brignole M, Alboni P, Benditt DG et al. Guidelines on management (diagnosis and treatment) of syncope-update 2004. Europace 2004; 6: 467-537. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Calkins H, Shyr Y, Frumin H et al. The value of the clinical history in the differentiation of syncope due to ventricular tachycardia, atrioventricular block, and neurocardiogenic syncope. Am J Med 1995; 98: 365-373. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Colivicchi F, Ammirati F, Melina D et al. Development and prospective validation of a risk stratification system for patients with syncope in the emergency department: the OESIL risk score. Eur Heart J 2003; 24: 811-819. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Colman N, Nahm K, Ganzeboom KS et al. Epidemiology of reflex syncope. Clin Auton Res 2004; 14(Suppl 1): 9-17. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Del Rosso A, Alboni P, Brignole M et al. Relation of clinical presentation of syncope to the age of patients. Am J Cardiol 2005; 96: 1431-1435. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Hamer AW, Bray JE Clinical recognition of neurally mediated syncope. Intern Med J 2005; 35: 216-221. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Kautzner J, Synkopa. In: Ascherman M. Kardiologie. Praha: Galén 2004: 1173-1181.
  9. Kovac J, Skehan JD. Long-term monitoring of patients with a syncope of obscure etiology with an implantable monitoring device. Vnitř Lék 2000; 46: 328-331. Go to PubMed...
  10. Kula S, Olgunturk R, Tunaoglu FS et al. Distribution of syncopal episodes in children and adolescents with neurally mediated cardiac syncope through the day. Europace 2005; 7: 634-637. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Martin GJ, Adams SL, Martin HG et al. Prospective evaluation of syncope. Ann Emerg Med 1984; 13: 499-504. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. Mitro P, Szakács M. The influence of the passive phase shortening on the diagnostic yield of nitroglycerine stimulated head-up tilt test. Vnitř Lék 2005; 51: 1272-1276.
  13. Praus R, Parizek P, Cervinka P et al. Syncope in ventricular tachycardia as a first clinical sign of patent ductus arteriosus in an adulthood. Vnitř Lék 2004; 50: 873-876. Go to PubMed...
  14. Semrad B. The clinical symptoms, the diagnostics and the therapy of orthostatic intolerance. Vnitř Lék 2006; 52 113-114. Go to PubMed...
  15. Sheldon R, Rose S, Ritchie D et al. Historical criteria that distinguish syncope from seizures. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002; 40: 142-148. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  16. Soteriades ES, Evans JC, Larson MG et al. Incidence and prognosis of syncope. N Engl J Med 2002; 347: 878-885. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...




Vnitřní lékařství

Madam, Sir,
please be aware that the website on which you intend to enter, not the general public because it contains technical information about medicines, including advertisements relating to medicinal products. This information and communication professionals are solely under §2 of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. Is active persons authorized to prescribe or supply (hereinafter expert).
Take note that if you are not an expert, you run the risk of danger to their health or the health of other persons, if you the obtained information improperly understood or interpreted, and especially advertising which may be part of this site, or whether you used it for self-diagnosis or medical treatment, whether in relation to each other in person or in relation to others.

I declare:

  1. that I have met the above instruction
  2. I'm an expert within the meaning of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. the regulation of advertising, as amended, and I am aware of the risks that would be a person other than the expert input to these sites exhibited


No

Yes

If your statement is not true, please be aware
that brings the risk of danger to their health or the health of others.