Vnitr Lek 2009, 55(3):227-232

Treatment of deep vein thrombosis with continuous intravenous infusion of LMWH in children - an alternative to subcutaneous application when needed

J. Blatný*, V. Fiamoli
Department of Clinical Haematology, Children's University Hospital Brno, head prof. MUDr. Miroslav Penka, CSc.

Incidence of thrombosis is age dependent with the lowest risk in the childhood. Children mostly suffer from vein thrombosis. Incidence of thrombosis in children is only 0.07/10 000, but it increases among hospitalized children (3.5/10 000). Subcutaneous administration of low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) is preferred treatment of deep vein thrombosis in children. In this study we present group of 33 children with deep vein thrombosis, who were treated with LMWH for their first thrombosis from 2003 till 2006. Twenty-one (63.6%) patients were treated with LMWH by continuous infusion and 12 (36.3%) patients by subcutaneous injection. Duration of the treatment with LMWH was modified in accordance with the course of thrombosis (monitored by Doppler ultrasound with compression) with median of 15 days in patients treated by continuous infusion and 18.5 days when treated subcutaneously. Median dose of LMWH for intravenous and subcutaneous application was 240 IU/kg/24 h and 215 IU/kg/24 h respectively. The administered dose of LMWH was modified to achieve and maintain required therapeutic antiXa level within the range of 0.5-1 IU/ml. The treatment with continuous infusion led to total recanalisation of the occluded vein in 3 cases (14.3%), partial recanalisation was achieved in 15 (71.4%) patients. Three (14.3%) patients were without any recanalisation. The treatment by subcutaneous injection led to total recanalisation of the vein in 4 cases (33.3%), partial recanalisation was seen in 4 (33.3%) patients. Four (33.3%) patients were without any recanalisation. The difference in the outcomes of the therapy between both groups appears to be statistically significant (p = 0.041, nonparametric Mann-Whitney test). We have not noticed any severe adverse event of the treatment in any of our patients. Our results support the hypothesis that the treatment of DVT with continuous infusion of LMWH might be efficient and safe alternative to subcutaneous application in those children in whom we want to avoid subcutaneous administration from certain reasons.

Keywords: deep vein thrombosis; LMWH; thrombosis; antiXa

Received: February 3, 2009; Published: March 1, 2009  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Blatný J, Fiamoli V. Treatment of deep vein thrombosis with continuous intravenous infusion of LMWH in children - an alternative to subcutaneous application when needed. Vnitr Lek. 2009;55(3):227-232.
Download citation

References

  1. Hirsh J. Heparin. N Eng J Med 1991; 324: 1565-1574. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Collins R, Serimgeour A, Yusuf S et al. Reduction in fatal pulmonary embolism and venous thrombosis by perioperative administration of subcutaneous heparin: overview of results of randomized trials in general, orthopedics and urologic surgery. N Eng J Med 1988; 318: 1162-1173. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Clagett GP, Reisch JS. Prevention in trombembolism in surgical patiens. Ann Surg 1988; 208: 227-240. Go to original source...
  4. Castaman C, Roderghiero F, Dini E. Thrombotic complication during L-asparaginase treatement for acute lymfoblastic leukemia. Haematologica 1990; 75: 567-569. Go to PubMed...
  5. Wise RC, Todd JK. Spontaneous lower-extremity venous thrombosis in children. Am J Dis Child 1973; 126: 766-769. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Bernstein D, Coupy S, Schouberg SK. Pulmonary embolism in adolescent. Am J Dis Child 1986; 140: 667-671. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Andrew M, David M, Adams M et al. Venous trombembolic (VTE) complication in children: first analyse of the Canadian registry of TVE. Blood 1994; 83: 1251-1257. Go to original source...
  8. Schmidt B, Andrew M. Neonathal thrombosis: report of a prospectiv Canadian and Internetional registry. Paediatrics 1995; 96: 939-943. Go to original source...
  9. Monagle P, Adams M, Mahoney M et al. Long-term outcome of pediatric thromboembolic disease: a repor from the canadian Chilhood Thrombophilia registry. Pediatr Res 2000; 47: 763-766. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. David M, Andrew M. Venous trombembolism complications in children: a critical review of the literature. J Pediatr 1993; 123: 337-346. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Andrew M, Monagle P, Brooker L. Thrombembolic complications during infancy and childhood. B. C. Decker, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada 2000.
  12. Monagle P, Chalmers E, Chan A et al. Antithrombotic Therapy in Neonates and Children: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence.Based Clinical Praktice Guidelines (8th ed). Chest 2008; 133: 887-968. Go to original source...
  13. Massicotte P et al. An open-label randomized controlled trial of low molecular weight heparin compared to heparin and coumadin for the treatment of venous thrombembolic events in children: the REVIVE trial. Thromb Res 2003; 109: 85-92. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. Hoffman U, Harenberg J, Bauer K et al. Bioequivalence of subcutaneous and intravenous body-weight-independent high-dose low-molecular-weight heparin Certoparin on anti-Xa, Geotest, and tissue factor pathway inhibitor activity in volunteers. Blood Coagulation and Fibrinolysis 2002; 13: 289-296. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...




Vnitřní lékařství

Madam, Sir,
please be aware that the website on which you intend to enter, not the general public because it contains technical information about medicines, including advertisements relating to medicinal products. This information and communication professionals are solely under §2 of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. Is active persons authorized to prescribe or supply (hereinafter expert).
Take note that if you are not an expert, you run the risk of danger to their health or the health of other persons, if you the obtained information improperly understood or interpreted, and especially advertising which may be part of this site, or whether you used it for self-diagnosis or medical treatment, whether in relation to each other in person or in relation to others.

I declare:

  1. that I have met the above instruction
  2. I'm an expert within the meaning of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. the regulation of advertising, as amended, and I am aware of the risks that would be a person other than the expert input to these sites exhibited


No

Yes

If your statement is not true, please be aware
that brings the risk of danger to their health or the health of others.