Vnitr Lek 2020, 66(7):e13-e19 | DOI: 10.36290/vnl.2020.133

Biomarkers for non-endoscopic examination of esophageal mucosa

Tereza Deissová1,2, Zdeněk Kala3, Ondřej Slabý2, Jiří Dolina4, Radek Kroupa4, Lumír Kunovský3 ,4, Lydie Izakovičová Hollá1,5, Petra Bořilová Linhartová1,5,6,7
1 Ústav patologické fyziologie LF MU Brno
2 CEITEC MU Brno
3 Chirurgická klinika LF MU a FN Brno, pracoviště Bohunice
4 Interní gastroenterologická klinika LF MU a FN Brno, pracoviště Bohunice
5 Stomatologická klinika LF MU a FN u sv. Anny v Brně
6 Klinika ústní, čelistní a obličejové chirurgie LF MU a FN Brno, pracoviště Bohunice
7 Ústav lékařské genetiky LF MU Brno

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a multifactorial disease; an individual´s genetic predisposition may contribute to the development of this disorder. Endoscopic methods and histological examination are commonly used to diagnose GERD and its complications such as Barrett's esophagus (BE) and esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). For BE screening in high-risk individuals as well as monitoring the development of BE dysplasia, esophageal mucosa samples could be taken using modern non-endoscopic procedures to minimize invasiveness of the procedure and improve patient adherence and compliance with a treatment. Esophageal mucosa samples taken by non-endoscopic or endoscopic biopsy can be analyzed both by immunohistochemistry and molecular biology analysis for specific biomarkers. Markers such as caudal type homeobox 2 (CDX2) and protein p53 have found their use in GERD diagnosis, and therefore research in recent years has focused on identifying other biomarkers that could reliably predict the development and progression of BE or EAC. This review article summarizes information on modern non-endoscopic methods of sampling from the esophagus mucosa and biomarkers, which have been studied in connection with the prediction and diagnosis of BE and EAC and have a potential for the use in clinical practice.

Keywords: Barrett's esophagus, esophageal adenocarcinoma, biomarkers, CytospongeTM, EsoCheck, EsophaCapsTM, miRNA, protein p53.

Published: November 3, 2020  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Deissová T, Kala Z, Slabý O, Dolina J, Kroupa R, Kunovský L, et al.. Biomarkers for non-endoscopic examination of esophageal mucosa. Vnitr Lek. 2020;66(7):e13-19. doi: 10.36290/vnl.2020.133.
Download citation

References

  1. Clermont M, Falk WG. Clinical guidelines update on the diagnosis and management of Barrett´s esophagus. Dig Dis Sci 2018; 63: 2122-2128. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Fass R, Dickman R. Clinical Consequences of Silent Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 2006; 8: 194-200. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Sawas T, Killcoyne S, Iyer PG, et al. Identification of Prognostic Phenotypes of Esophageal Adenocarcinoma in 2 Independent Cohorts. Gastroenterology 2018; 155: 1720-1728. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Kroupa R. Barrettův jícen, rizikové faktory, léčba. Interní Med 2012; 14: 104-106.
  5. Freeman M, Offman J, Walter MF, et al. Acceptability of the Cytosponge procedure for detecting Barrett's oesophagus: a qualitative study. BMJ Open 2017; 7: e013901. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Shaheen N, Falk GW, Iyer PG, et al. ACG Clinical Guideline: Diagnosis and Management of Barrett's Esophagus. Am J Gastroenterol 2016; 111: 30-50. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Fitzgerald RC, di Pietro M, Ragunath K, et al. British Society of Gastroenterology guidelines on the diagnosis and management of Barrett's oesophagus. Gut 2014; 63: 7-42. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Iqbal U, Siddique O, Ovalle A, et al. Safety and efficacy of a minimally invasive cell sampling device ('Cytosponge') in the diagnosis of esophageal pathology: a systematic review. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2018; 30: 1261-1269. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. Katzka AD. Recent Advances in Non-invasive Esophageal Tissue Sampling. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 2017; 19: 9. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. Szoka N, Fazi J. 2019. Cytosponge™ - A SAGES Technology and Value Assessment. SAGES - Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (online). Dostupné z: https://www.sages.org/publications/tavac/cytosponge/
  11. Zhou Z, Kalatskaya I, Russell D, et al. Combined EsophaCap cytology and MUC2 immunohistochemistry for screening of intestinal metaplasia, dysplasia and carcinoma. Clin Exp Gastroenterol 2019; 12: 219-229. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. Li X, Kleeman S, Coburn SB, et al. Selection and Application of Tissue microRNAs for Nonendoscopic Diagnosis of Barrett's Esophagus. Gastroenterology 2018; 155: 771-783. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. Wang Z, Kambhampati S, Cheng Y, et al. Methylation Biomarker Panel Performance in EsophaCap Cytology Samples for Diagnosing Barrett's Esophagus: A Prospective Validation Study. Clin Cancer Res 2019; 1: 2127-2135. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. EsoCheck | Lucid Diagnostics | United State. Lucid Diagnostics | Biomarkers for Esophageal Cancer | New York (online). Copyright © 2019 Lucid Diagnostics (cit. 23.10.2019). Dostupné z: https://www.luciddx.com/esocheck
  15. Moinova HR, LaFramboise T, Lutterbaugh JD, et al. Identifying DNA methylation biomarkers for non-endoscopic detection of Barrett's esophagus. Sci Transl Med 2018; 17: pii: eaao5848. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  16. Qureshi AP, Stachler MD, Haque O, et al. Biomarkers for Barrett's esophagus - a contemporary review. Expert Rev Mol Diagn 2018; 18: 939-946. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  17. Naini VB, Souza FR, Odze DR. Barrett's Esophagus: A Comprehensive and Contemporary Review for Pathologists. Am J Surg Pathol 2016; 40: e45-e66. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  18. Mutační analýza genu p53 - Oddělení lékařské genetiky FN Brno. Oddělení lékařské genetiky FN Brno (online). Copyright © 2016 (cit. 25.10.2019). Dostupné z: https://genetikabrno.eu/vysetrujeme/mutacni-analyza-genu-p53/
  19. Chettouh H, Mowforth O, Galeano-Dalmau N, et al. Methylation panel is a diagnostic biomarker for Barrett's oesophagus in endoscopic biopsies and nonendoscopic cytology specimens. Gut 2018; 67: 1942-1949. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  20. Iyer PG, Taylor WR, Johnson ML, et al. Highly Discriminant Methylated DNA Markers for the Non-endoscopic Detection of Barrett's Esophagus. Am J Gastroenterol 2018; 113: 1156-1166. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  21. Kailasam A, Mittal KS, Agrawal KD. Epigenetics in the Pathogenesis of Esophageal Adenocarcinoma. Clin Transl Sci 2015; 8: 394-402. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  22. Cassandri M, Smirnov A, Novelli F, et al. Zinc-finger proteins in health and disease. Cell Death Discov 2017; 3: 17071. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  23. Jia Y, Yang Y, Brock VM, et al. Methylation of TFPI-2 is an early event of esophageal carcinogenesis. Epigenomics 2012; 4: 135-146. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  24. Shivdasani RA. MicroRNAs: regulators of gene expression and cell differentiation. Blood 2006; 108: 3646-3653. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  25. Slaby O, Srovnal J, Radova L, et al. Dynamic changes in microRNA expression profiles reflect progression of Barrett's esophagus to esophageal adenocarcinoma. Carcinogenesis 2015; 36: 521-527. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  26. Konda AJV, Souza FR. Biomarkers of Barrett's Esophagus: From the Laboratory to Clinical Practice. Dig Dis Sci 2018; 63: 2070-2080. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  27. Fabisiak A, Bartoszek A, Kardas G, et al. Possible application of trefoil factor family peptides in gastroesophageal reflux and Barrett's esophagus. Peptides 2019; 115: 27-31. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  28. Miller MD, Thomas DS, Islam A, et al. c-Myc and Cancer Metabolism. Clin Cancer Res 2012; 18: 5546-5553. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  29. Rugge M, Fassan M, Zaninotto G, et al. Aurora kinase A in Barrett's carcinogenesis. Hum Pathol 2010; 41: 1380-1386. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  30. CGB laboratoře. CGB laboratoře (online). Copyright © 2016, CGB laboratoř a.s. (cit. 20.09.2019). Dostupné z: http://www.pathology.cz/
  31. Groisman MG, Amar M, Meir A. Expression of the intestinal marker Cdx2 in the columnar-lined esophagus with and without intestinal (Barrett's) metaplasia. Mod Pathol 2004; 17: 1282-1288. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  32. Lalkhen GA, McCluskey A. Clinical tests: sensitivity and specificity. Continuing Education in Anaesthesia Critical Care & Pain 2008; 8: 221-223. Go to original source...
  33. Thota, Chak. Mass Screening for Barrett's esophagus: Myth or Reality? Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2018; 17: 610-612. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  34. Kadri SR, Lao-Sirieix P, O'Donovan M, et al. Acceptability and accuracy of a non-endoscopic screening test for Barrett's oesophagus in primary care: cohort study. BMJ 2010; 10; 341: c4372. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  35. Ross-Innes CS, Debiram-Beecham I, O'Donovan M, et al. Evaluation of a minimally invasive cell sampling device coupled with assessment of trefoil factor 3 expression for diagnosing Barrett's esophagus: a multi-center case-control study. PLoS Med 2015; 29; e1001780. Go to original source...
  36. Ross-Innes CS, Chettouh H, Achilleos A, et al. Risk stratification of Barrett's oesophagus using a non-endoscopic sampling method coupled with a biomarker panel: a cohort study. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol.2017; 2: 23-31. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  37. Kroupa R, Konečný Š, Dolina J. Současné trendy v diagnostice a léčbě refluxní nemoci jícnu. Vnitř Lék 2018; 64: 588-594. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  38. Svoboda P, Dítě P, Klvaňa P, et al. Rizikové faktory a prediktory progrese Barretova jícnu do adenokarcinomu. Vnitř Lék 2014; 60: 467-473. Go to PubMed...




Vnitřní lékařství

Madam, Sir,
please be aware that the website on which you intend to enter, not the general public because it contains technical information about medicines, including advertisements relating to medicinal products. This information and communication professionals are solely under §2 of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. Is active persons authorized to prescribe or supply (hereinafter expert).
Take note that if you are not an expert, you run the risk of danger to their health or the health of other persons, if you the obtained information improperly understood or interpreted, and especially advertising which may be part of this site, or whether you used it for self-diagnosis or medical treatment, whether in relation to each other in person or in relation to others.

I declare:

  1. that I have met the above instruction
  2. I'm an expert within the meaning of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. the regulation of advertising, as amended, and I am aware of the risks that would be a person other than the expert input to these sites exhibited


No

Yes

If your statement is not true, please be aware
that brings the risk of danger to their health or the health of others.